Some volunteers held a hand in ice water while being watched. Others went through a calm version of the same task. Then everyone learned two actions, each of which won a different snack.
Next, each person ate one of the two snacks until they were sick of it. Then the snacks stopped coming, and they were left to press away as they liked. The calm group stopped pressing for the food they no longer wanted. The stressed group kept on pressing for it. They knew less, too, about which action had won which snack.
Stress had taken the decision away from them and handed it to habit. Nobody chose that snack. The habit did.
The problem with most habit change advice is that it starts in the wrong place. It starts with the new habit you want, and with how badly you want it. The real reason your habits never stick is usually the old one. It is still there, still wired to the same cues, and it takes over whenever you are tired, rushed or under pressure.
So this page is about the habit you already have: the loop it runs on, why stress hands it back the controls, and the tested ways to break it. Why Motivation Fails — and What Keeps Habits Going After It Does, linked below, covers the other half, building the new one.
The loop
Charles Duhigg's book made a three-part loop famous. The cue is the trigger: a place, a time, a feeling, a person, or whatever you were doing just before. The routine is the behaviour itself. The reward is what makes the brain remember the loop and run it again.
Underneath it is a finding from rats. As they learned a maze until they ran it on autopilot, the activity in a deep part of the brain called the striatum changed shape. It came to bunch at the beginning of the run and at the end, with less in between. It was as if the brain had packaged the whole run as one unit, started by the cue and closed by the reward, and the new pattern stayed stable for weeks.
That is why willpower at the moment of the urge is the weakest point to step in. By the time you notice yourself reaching for the phone or the snack cupboard, the package has already been opened. Your hand is in the biscuit tin before the argument starts. The two stronger points are the ends: the cue that starts it and the reward that closes it.
Why stress hands it back
The volunteers at the top are not a quirk. In five other sets of tests, people whose self-control had been run down fell back on their habits, and it did not matter whether the habit was good or bad. Low willpower did not make people worse. It made them more like their habits. Wendy Wood, one of the authors of that work, sets out the rest in .
That cuts both ways, and the useful half is this: a good habit that is strong enough is exactly what carries you through a hard week. The trouble is that a new habit is not yet strong, and the old one has years on it. On a calm day the new one wins. On a bad day the old one does. A new habit is a fair-weather friend. The old one turns up in a storm.
So practise the new habit on the hard days on purpose: after a difficult conversation, when you are tired, in a busy week. A habit that has only ever been done on easy days has not been tested.
Find the cue
Most cues work below notice. The urge arrives before you have spotted what set it off.
For one week, change nothing. Each time the habit happens, write down what happened in the five minutes before: where you were, how you felt, who was there, and what you had just been doing. A pattern usually shows up within days.
Writing it down is more than busywork. Across 122 programmes with 44,747 people trying to eat better or move more, keeping a record of what you did explained more of the difference between the programmes that worked and those that did not than any other technique, and it worked best alongside at least one more step of the same kind, such as setting a goal or checking progress against it.
Watch for chains, where one behaviour cues the next. Sitting on the sofa cues the remote, the remote cues the snack. Break one link and the rest of the chain often goes with it.
The body is often the first cue. A tight jaw, shallow breathing or tension across the shoulders can come just before the habit does, and once you know your own sign, it gives you a moment's warning.
Change the cue
Your surroundings decide more than your intentions do, and small changes count.
In a large hospital cafeteria, some healthy items were moved to where they were easier to see and reach. Sales of bottled water went up by 25.8%. In two other cafeterias run by the same hospital, where nothing was moved, they did not. Out of sight, out of mind works the other way round too, and here it is a sales figure. How to Outsmart Cravings and Make Healthier Choices Without Relying on Willpower has what moving food farther away did to how much of it was eaten.
So add friction to the habit you want to drop. Take the app off the phone's home screen, or put the phone itself in a for the hours you want back. Whether the phone's mere presence costs you attention is less settled than it sounds, and Hidden Habits Sabotaging Your Productivity—and How to Fix Them has the tests on both sides. Put the snacks in an opaque box at the back of the cupboard, or do not buy them. Keep cigarettes somewhere that takes a deliberate trip to reach. Each extra step gives the thinking part of you time to arrive.
And take friction away from the habit you want. Clothes by the bed. The water jug on the desk. The book on the chair where you sit.
Keep the cue, swap the routine
You can redirect a craving, but wiping it out is hard. The cue will keep arriving, and the reward is still wanted. So keep both and change what happens in the middle.
That is how a therapy called habit reversal works. It trains people to notice the moment the urge starts and to answer it with a competing response: a movement that cannot be done at the same time as the habit, such as clenching a fist when the hand wants to go to the mouth. Across 18 tests with 575 people, it worked well for nail biting, thumb sucking, tics, jaw clenching and stuttering. The method was first published in 1973, and a self-help version called decoupling also showed an effect in a later review, so it is not only for a clinic.
The same idea works for stress eating. The cue is the bad day, the reward is relief, and the routine can be a walk instead of the cupboard. The cravings article above has the test in which a brisk fifteen-minute walk cut the urge for chocolate.
Ride the urge
An urge feels as though it will grow until you give in. It does not have to be obeyed to pass. An urge is loud. It is not in charge.
123 student smokers were shown cigarettes and smoking cues to bring on cravings. Half had first been given brief instructions in "urge surfing". The instructions did not make the cravings any weaker. But over the next week, the urge surfers smoked fewer cigarettes. What changed was what they did with the urge, not how strong it felt.
The method is simple. Notice the urge rising. Find where it sits in your body: a tight chest, restless hands, a hollow stomach. Watch it build, peak and fall, the way a wave does, without doing anything about it. Each time it passes without the habit, the link between the cue and the routine gets a little weaker.
A longer course goes further. 88 smokers on about 20 cigarettes a day were given four weeks of either mindfulness training, built on the same kind of attention, or a standard stop-smoking course. Seventeen weeks later, 31% of the mindfulness group were not smoking, against 6% of the others.
If watching the wave is too much, give your eyes something else to do. 31 students reported their cravings seven times a day for a week. When half of them played Tetris for three minutes after each report, the cravings fell by about 14 points on a scale of 100, whether the craving was for cigarettes, alcohol, coffee, food or a game, and the effect held all week.
Use a moving day
Habits lean on their surroundings, so when the surroundings change, they wobble. That is a window.
800 households were followed, half of which had recently moved home. Some were given a push towards greener everyday habits, and the push worked better in the households that had just moved. The window seemed to last about three months after the move.
The most famous case is far starker. In the 1970s, Lee Robins studied American soldiers who had been addicted to heroin or opium in Vietnam. Many of them recovered of their own accord once they were back in the United States, a finding that challenged the idea that such addiction could not be reversed. Leaving the setting behind was enough for many of them.
A new house, a new job, a new term, even a rearranged kitchen: each one loosens the old cues for a while. If you have one coming, plan the change for then.
Change the name
"I'm trying to quit smoking" describes a struggle. "I'm a non-smoker" describes a person. A non-smoker has nothing to resist.
The difference has been tested on a large scale. Before two state elections in the United States, people were asked either how important it was to them "to vote" or how important it was "to be a voter". The ones asked about being a voter were more likely to turn out, in official voting records.
So say the new habit as who you are, in the present tense, before it feels true. Each small repetition then counts as evidence for it.
Change the company
Habits travel through people. In the Framingham Heart Study, 12,067 people were followed from 1971 to 2003, and smokers and non-smokers clustered together; whole groups stopped together. When a husband or wife stopped smoking, a person's chance of smoking fell by 67%. A friend stopping cut it by 36%, a brother or sister by 25%, and a co-worker in a small firm by 34%. Neighbours on the same street made no difference.
It is a link, and it points somewhere useful: the people closest to you are part of the cue. Change with someone.
Put money on it
Smokers were offered a savings account. They paid money into it for six months, then took a test for nicotine. If they passed, they got their money back. If they failed, it went to charity.
Only 11% of those offered it signed up. Even so, the smokers who were offered it were 3 percentage points more likely to pass the test than those who were not, and the difference was still there in surprise tests at twelve months. Few things focus the mind like your own money going to charity.
A small stake you would hate to lose works on the same principle: a promise to a friend, a sum you will hand over, a bet. It gives the old habit something to lose too.
A reward works from the other side. 878 employees of one large company were offered up to $750 for finishing a stop-smoking course and staying off cigarettes, checked by a test. At 9 to 12 months, 14.7% of them had stopped, against 5.0% of those given information alone, and six months after that it was still 9.4% against 3.6%.
After a slip
Missing one day is a mistake. The "what the hell" response to that mistake is what creates the relapse. The habits article linked below has the dieters who ate more once they believed a rule was already broken, and the kindness that stopped it.
After a real relapse, restart smaller than before. Someone who has dropped a daily gym session gets back faster with ten minutes of walking a day than by charging straight back to the full session.
Track what you do rather than the result. Weight is slow to move and easy to be discouraged by. Steps walked and meals cooked at home move every day.
Two things often sold as fixes are smaller than they sound. A fresh start, a new week or a birthday, makes people more likely to begin, and that is all it was shown to do. Pairing a treat you want with a chore you avoid lifted gym visits by about half at first, and the effect faded within weeks. Why Your Brain Sabotages You Every Time You Try to Start has both. And the new habit takes longer than the 21 days you may have heard, which the habits article also covers.
When it is more than a habit
A habit stays under your control and answers to the methods on this page. An addiction is different: it goes on despite serious harm, it may bring withdrawal symptoms when you stop, and it often comes with hiding the behaviour or lying about it. If you have tried in earnest several times and failed, if stopping brings on withdrawal, if the harm is serious, or if you are hiding it, get help from a support service. That is a different problem, and it needs a different kind of help.
The snack nobody wanted
Go back to the volunteers pressing for a snack they were sick of. They had not failed at willpower. They were stressed, and the habit ran.
Yours will run too, on the hard days. So set it up on the easy ones: move the cue, swap the routine, and have the new habit practised before the bad week comes.
Habits do not care how much you want to change. They care what is in front of you.
This week, keep the log: every time the habit happens, write down the five minutes before.
Want to build the new habit, not just break the old one? Why Motivation Fails — and What Keeps Habits Going After It Does — the 66 days, the missed day, and what keeps a habit going once the enthusiasm runs out.
Is your habit a craving for food? How to Outsmart Cravings and Make Healthier Choices Without Relying on Willpower — blood sugar, sleep, stress and the cupboard, and what to do when a craving arrives anyway.
Know someone who keeps falling back into the same habit? Send them this, and keep the log alongside them for a week.
Disclaimer: This article is general information. For advice about your own health, talk to a qualified health professional. If a habit has become an addiction, or stopping brings on withdrawal, get help from a support service.
Affiliate Disclosure: This article contains affiliate links. As an Amazon Associate, All For Life earns from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you. We only link to products we would recommend without the commission.
Sources
Schwabe L, Wolf OT (2009). Stress Prompts Habit Behavior in Humans. The Journal of Neuroscience 29(22):7191–7198. doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0979-09.2009
Wikipedia. The Power of Habit. en.wikipedia.org
Jog MS, Kubota Y, Connolly CI, Hillegaart V, Graybiel AM (1999). Building Neural Representations of Habits. Science 286(5445):1745–1749. doi.org/10.1126/science.286.5445.1745
Neal DT, Wood W, Drolet A (2013). How do people adhere to goals when willpower is low? The profits (and pitfalls) of strong habits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 104(6):959–975. doi.org/10.1037/a0032626
Michie S, Abraham C, Whittington C, McAteer J, Gupta S (2009). Effective techniques in healthy eating and physical activity interventions: A meta-regression. Health Psychology 28(6):690–701. doi.org/10.1037/a0016136
Thorndike AN, Sonnenberg L, Riis J, Barraclough S, Levy DE (2012). A 2-Phase Labeling and Choice Architecture Intervention to Improve Healthy Food and Beverage Choices. American Journal of Public Health 102(3):527–533. doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2011.300391
Wikipedia. Habit reversal training. en.wikipedia.org
Bate KS, Malouff JM, Thorsteinsson ET, Bhullar N (2011). The efficacy of habit reversal therapy for tics, habit disorders, and stuttering: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review 31(5):865–871. doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2011.03.013
Bowen S, Marlatt A (2009). Surfing the urge: Brief mindfulness-based intervention for college student smokers. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 23(4):666–671. doi.org/10.1037/a0017127
Brewer JA, Mallik S, Babuscio TA, et al. (2011). Mindfulness training for smoking cessation: Results from a randomized controlled trial. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 119(1-2):72–80. doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.05.027
Skorka-Brown J, Andrade J, Whalley B, May J (2015). Playing Tetris decreases drug and other cravings in real world settings. Addictive Behaviors 51:165–170. doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.07.020
Verplanken B, Roy D (2016). Empowering interventions to promote sustainable lifestyles: Testing the habit discontinuity hypothesis in a field experiment. Journal of Environmental Psychology 45:127–134. doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.11.008
Wikipedia. Lee Robins. en.wikipedia.org
Bryan CJ, Walton GM, Rogers T, Dweck CS (2011). Motivating voter turnout by invoking the self. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108(31):12653–12656. doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1103343108
Christakis NA, Fowler JH (2008). The Collective Dynamics of Smoking in a Large Social Network. New England Journal of Medicine 358(21):2249–2258. doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa0706154
Giné X, Karlan D, Zinman J (2010). Put Your Money Where Your Butt Is: A Commitment Contract for Smoking Cessation. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 2(4):213–235. doi.org/10.1257/app.2.4.213
Volpp KG, Troxel AB, Pauly MV, et al. (2009). A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Financial Incentives for Smoking Cessation. New England Journal of Medicine 360(7):699–709. doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa0806819
Dai H, Milkman KL, Riis J (2014). The Fresh Start Effect: Temporal Landmarks Motivate Aspirational Behavior. Management Science 60(10):2563–2582. doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1901
Milkman KL, Minson JA, Volpp KGM (2014). Holding the Hunger Games Hostage at the Gym: An Evaluation of Temptation Bundling. Management Science 60(2):283–299. doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2013.1784