A stranger walks up to a queue at a photocopier and asks to go first. "Excuse me, I have five pages. May I use the machine?" Sixty percent of people let them. Add a reason, "because I'm in a rush", and it jumps to 94 percent. Now the strange part. Add a reason that says nothing at all, "because I have to make copies", and 93 percent still step aside.
The word "because" did almost all the work. For a small favour, people barely listened to the reason. They just heard that there was one. When the favour got bigger, twenty pages where it had been five, the empty reason stopped working completely.
That's influence in two lines. Small things run on autopilot. Anything that matters, to your partner, your kids or the people you work with, runs on something else: whether they feel heard, whether you're clear, and whether you give them a real reason. One word is only the start. Ahead: why Benjamin Franklin borrowed a book from an enemy, why long words make people seem less clever, and which small change of wording makes advice easier to take.
Give a real reason
When the stakes are low, any reason will do. When they rise, people start listening to it. So when it matters, give the real one. "Can you pick the kids up today, because my meeting's been moved to the end of the day" works better than "Can you pick the kids up?" and far better than a long justification. One honest reason, said plainly, does the job.
Start small
The best way to get a big yes is often a small yes first. In a classic test, homeowners were asked to put a large, ugly "Drive Carefully" sign in their front garden. Only 17 percent agreed. But among those who had first agreed to something small and similar, a little sign about safe driving, 76 percent said yes to the big one.
Once people have taken a step, they start to see themselves as the kind of person who takes that step. That works at home too. A teenager who agrees to ten minutes of tidying is closer to an hour than one who's been handed the whole job at once. Use it to help, though. A small yes used to trap someone into a big one is pressure, and people notice.
Give first
A small, genuine kindness opens doors. In a test dressed up as an art-appreciation session, a partner called Joe either brought the other person a soft drink during a break or came back empty-handed. Afterwards Joe asked them to buy raffle tickets. Those who'd been given the drink bought more, and once Joe had given it, how much they liked him no longer predicted how many tickets they bought. The favour mattered more than the friendship. covers this and the other everyday levers of persuasion.
At home, that looks like making the tea before raising the awkward subject, or covering a chore before asking for one in return. Keep it genuine. A gift with an invoice attached gets recognised for what it is.
Ask for their advice
Asking for advice feels like admitting weakness, so people avoid it. The worry is misplaced. People who asked for advice were judged more competent than those who kept quiet, especially when the task was hard and when they asked the person directly.
It also changes the other person's role. "What would you do here?" turns someone from an opponent into a contributor, and it's easier to back a plan you helped shape. With a partner or a teenager, asking for their view first often gets you further than presenting a plan for approval.
Benjamin Franklin used the same move on a rival in the Pennsylvania Assembly. He wrote asking to borrow a rare book from the man's library, returned it a week later with a warm note, and the rival, who had never spoken to him, greeted him civilly at the next sitting and became a friend for life. Asking someone for a favour can win them over as surely as doing them one.
Show what others do
People take their cue from people like them. Hotels usually ask guests to reuse their towels to protect the environment. When the card in the bathroom said instead that the majority of guests reuse their towels, more did: about 44 percent against 35. The best result came from the card saying that the majority of guests who had stayed in that same room reused theirs. A later attempt in two German hotels found no extra boost from the "other guests" message, so treat it as a nudge that sometimes works.
At home, "The other families on our street walk their kids to school" moves people further than "Walking is good for them." It only works when it's true. A made-up majority gets found out, and takes your credibility with it.
Listen before you argue
In 1936 Dale Carnegie wrote that "the only way to get the best of an argument is to avoid it", and the evidence has since caught up with him. His is still worth reading for exactly that reason. If you want someone to rethink a strong opinion, the quickest route is often to stop trying to change it and listen properly instead.
When people talked about their views to a listener who was attentive, empathetic and non-judgmental, they became less anxious and less defensive. As a result, they noticed contradictions in their own position, held it less rigidly, and were more comfortable with the mixed feelings. No one argued with them. Being heard did the work.
Arguments usually go the other way. Each side pushes, the other side braces, and both leave more certain than before. Listening breaks that loop, because a person with nothing to defend has spare attention to think.
When it's your turn to make the case, start with the best point against you. When findings on persuasive messages were pooled, messages that raised the main objection and then answered it persuaded better than ones that ignored the other side. Raising an objection and leaving it unanswered persuaded worst of all. So "I know the car's cheaper to keep, and here's why I still think we should sell it" beats pretending there's no case for keeping it.
Name the feeling
Facts bounce off someone who's upset. Putting the feeling into words helps first. When people looked at upsetting images and named the emotion in them, the brain's alarm response was lower than when they just looked, or labelled something else about the picture.
In practice that sounds like "That sounds so frustrating" or "You were hoping I'd back you up." Naming the feeling calms the moment and shows you've understood. Then the facts have somewhere to land. Connection first, correction second.
Reason, feeling, choice
Put a real reason and a named feeling together, add one more ingredient, and you get influence that lasts. When people were set a dull task, those given a meaningful reason, an acknowledgement of how they felt about it ("I know this is boring") and a sense of choice took it on as their own. They kept it up later, when no one was watching. Without those three, people did what they had to and stopped.
With a child, that sounds like: "Homework now means a free evening later. I know it's the last thing you feel like. Do you want to start with maths or reading?" The same three work on adults.
Ten minutes can change a mind
Long-held views can shift faster than you'd think, with the right kind of conversation. Canvassers in South Florida had roughly ten-minute doorstep conversations with 501 voters about transgender people. There was no lecture. They asked people to recall a time they had been judged for being different, and to think about how it felt. Prejudice dropped, by more than the average American attitude shift on gay rights over fourteen years, and the change was still there three months later, even after people heard counterarguments.
The lesson travels. Losing an argument seldom changes a mind on its own. People change their minds when they're asked to look at something from the inside, with their own experience as the bridge.
Use their words
People feel understood when they hear themselves reflected back. When a waitress repeated customers' orders back to them word for word, her tips went up noticeably compared with when she just said "Coming up" or "OK".
The same habit works in any conversation that matters. When your partner says "I feel like I'm doing everything", start with "You feel like you're doing everything" before you bring up the dishwasher you emptied. It sounds simple because it is. It also tells them you were listening while they spoke. Kate Murphy's is a good guide to doing this well.
Keep it plain
Clarity persuades. Showing off backfires. When people read the same essays written in plain words or padded with long ones, they judged the authors of the long-word versions as less intelligent. The effort to sound clever made the writers seem less so.
Short sentences, ordinary words and one point at a time are easier to trust because they're easier to follow. If you need three paragraphs to make a request, the request is probably still fuzzy in your own head.
Ask in person
Some requests deserve your face. When students asked strangers to fill in a questionnaire, those who asked in person were 34 times more likely to get a yes than those who emailed the same words. The emailers expected to do better than they did, and the ones asking face to face expected to do worse. A message on a screen loses the tone, the eye contact and the trust that come with a person standing there.
So for anything that matters, ask in person, or at least call. "Can we talk about the holiday?" sent by text invites a quick no. The same question over dinner starts a conversation.
Drop the "must"
Pushing harder makes people push back. Health messages full of "should", "must" and "need" felt more threatening and drew more resistance than the same advice with "consider", "could" and "may". Adding a short line reminding readers that the decision was theirs reduced the resistance.
So "You need to stop working so late" becomes "You could try finishing earlier a couple of nights." And when you've made your case, say it out loud: "It's your call." Advice is easier to take when it's clearly still yours to take.
Calm is part of the message
Your state spreads. When people watched someone go through a stressful public test, a quarter of the watchers had a measurable rise in their own stress hormone, without being put under any stress themselves. When the person being tested was their partner, it was four in ten. Walk into a hard conversation wound up, and some of that tension reaches the other person before you've said a word. A braced person stops listening.
A short check-in before you start helps.
Settle your body. Feet on the floor, shoulders down, one slow breath out. Notice a tight jaw or a racing chest, and let it ease before you speak.
Slow your voice. Say the hard thing at a normal volume, and a little slower than feels natural.
Check your aim. Ask yourself whether you're trying to prove you're right or trying to connect. If it's the first, wait until it's the second.
A calm tone wins nothing on its own, but it keeps the other person open long enough to hear the rest.
Where influence stops
Influence and manipulation sit either side of a line. Stay well on the right side of it. Influence helps someone see a choice clearly and leaves the decision with them. Manipulation hides the choice, rushes it, or makes saying no costly.
Knowing the levers is also your best protection. Being warned about a pressure tactic in advance, with a sense of how to answer it, makes people harder to sway when the real thing arrives. So watch for the signs: a deadline that appears from nowhere, a favour that comes with a bill, a majority you can't check, a "must" that leaves you no say. When you spot one, slow down. "Let me sleep on it" is a full answer.
If your partner, parent or boss uses these tools to corner you, that's a different conversation, and the red-flags article linked below covers it.
Influence that lasts
A magic word works at a photocopier, when nothing is at stake. With the people who matter to you, there isn't one. What works instead is slower and more human: a real reason, a small first step, a kindness given first, a feeling named, a choice left with them, and a calm, plain way of saying it.
Next time you want someone to change their mind, settle yourself first. Then listen. Say back what you heard, name what they seem to feel, and only then make your case, in one plain sentence with one real reason. And leave the choice with them.
Want to say what you mean, and be understood? 7 Communication Tips for Your Relationship — everyday habits that help partners understand each other.
Worried that someone's influence over you has crossed a line? Relationship Red Flags You Should Never Ignore — the patterns that turn persuasion into control.
Know someone who keeps explaining and getting nowhere? Send them this. The fix usually involves less talking.
Disclaimer: This article is general information about relationships and communication.
Affiliate Disclosure: This article contains affiliate links. As an Amazon Associate, All For Life earns from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you. We only link to products we would recommend without the commission.
Sources
Langer EJ, Blank A, Chanowitz B (1978). The mindlessness of ostensibly thoughtful action: the role of "placebic" information in interpersonal interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 36(6):635–642. doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.36.6.635
Freedman JL, Fraser SC (1966). Compliance without pressure: the foot-in-the-door technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 4(2):195–202. doi.org/10.1037/h0023552
Regan DT (1971). Effects of a favor and liking on compliance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 7(6):627–639. doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(71)90025-4
Brooks AW, Gino F, Schweitzer ME (2015). Smart people ask for (my) advice: seeking advice boosts perceptions of competence. Management Science 61(6):1421–1435. doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.2054
Franklin B. The Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin. gutenberg.org
Goldstein NJ, Cialdini RB, Griskevicius V (2008). A room with a viewpoint: using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. Journal of Consumer Research 35(3):472–482. doi.org/10.1086/586910
Bohner G, Schlüter LE (2014). A room with a viewpoint revisited: descriptive norms and hotel guests' towel reuse behavior. PLoS One 9(8):e104086. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0104086
Carnegie D (1936). How to Win Friends and Influence People. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Itzchakov G, Kluger AN, Castro DR (2017). I am aware of my inconsistencies but can tolerate them: the effect of high quality listening on speakers' attitude ambivalence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 43(1):105–120. doi.org/10.1177/0146167216675339
O'Keefe DJ (1999). How to handle opposing arguments in persuasive messages: a meta-analytic review of the effects of one-sided and two-sided messages. Annals of the International Communication Association 22(1):209–249. doi.org/10.1080/23808985.1999.11678963
Lieberman MD, Eisenberger NI, Crockett MJ, et al. (2007). Putting feelings into words: affect labeling disrupts amygdala activity in response to affective stimuli. Psychological Science 18(5):421–428. doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01916.x
Deci EL, Eghrari H, Patrick BC, Leone DR (1994). Facilitating internalization: the self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Personality 62(1):119–142. doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1994.tb00797.x
Broockman D, Kalla J (2016). Durably reducing transphobia: a field experiment on door-to-door canvassing. Science 352(6282):220–224. doi.org/10.1126/science.aad9713
van Baaren RB, Holland RW, Steenaert B, van Knippenberg A (2003). Mimicry for money: behavioral consequences of imitation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 39(4):393–398. doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00014-3
Oppenheimer DM (2006). Consequences of erudite vernacular utilized irrespective of necessity: problems with using long words needlessly. Applied Cognitive Psychology 20(2):139–156. doi.org/10.1002/acp.1178
Roghanizad MM, Bohns VK (2017). Ask in person: you're less persuasive than you think over email. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 69:223–226. doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.10.002
Miller CH, Lane LT, Deatrick LM, Young AM, Potts KA (2007). Psychological reactance and promotional health messages: the effects of controlling language, lexical concreteness, and the restoration of freedom. Human Communication Research 33(2):219–240. doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00297.x
Engert V, Plessow F, Miller R, Kirschbaum C, Singer T (2014). Cortisol increase in empathic stress is modulated by emotional closeness and observation modality. Psychoneuroendocrinology 45:192–201. doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2014.04.005
Banas JA, Rains SA (2010). A meta-analysis of research on inoculation theory. Communication Monographs 77(3):281–311. doi.org/10.1080/03637751003758193