"What have you been up to?" can mean four different things. It can be real interest in your day, irritation that you're late, suspicion, or a playful hint that you know about the surprise party. Married couples, together for 14 years on average, sat back to back and took turns saying phrases like this one, each meant one particular way, to their spouse and to two strangers. Their spouse understood them no better than the strangers did. Yet they felt more sure that their spouse had understood, and the spouses felt more sure too.
That gap is where couples drift apart without noticing. The closer you are, the more you take for granted: that you're understood, that you're being listened to, that the little things can wait. And the less you check. The usual advice about body language and "active listening" misses it, because the drifting happens in small moments: a comment over breakfast, a text in the afternoon, a phone at the dinner table.
Those moments hold a few surprises. The famous 93 percent figure about body language turns out to be a misreading. And couples who stayed together kept up one small habit 86 percent of the time, while couples who split managed it 33 percent of the time.
1. Say what you mean, even to someone who knows you
With a stranger, you explain yourself. With a partner, you shorten everything, because surely they know what you mean. Often they miss it, and neither of you notices.
Closeness lets the checking slip. You hear your own meaning in your words, so they sound clear to you. Your partner hears their own guess, and it feels just as clear to them.
The fix is simple and a little unromantic. Say the meaning behind the words: "I'm asking because I was worried, not because I'm annoyed." When something matters, check what landed: "What did you hear me say?" And let go of the idea that a partner who loves you should just know. Expecting them to guess sets up a test no partner can pass every time.
Hints can feel like the kinder route, and in the moment they are. When 61 couples were filmed while each partner tried to get the other to change something, direct requests, whether kind or blunt, felt less successful at the time. Over the following year, they were the ones that led to real change. Gentle hints felt as if they had worked, and changed nothing.
Love languages promise another shortcut: learn which of five your partner speaks, and speak it. The idea is appealing, and the evidence behind it is thin. Gathered together in 2024, it gave little support to the three main claims: that each person has one preferred love language, that there are five, and that couples are happier when they match. Love works more like a balanced diet, where a relationship needs the full range of attention, affection, help and kind words. Your partner's needs also change from week to week, which is one more reason to ask what would help right now.
2. Turn toward the small bids
Couples rarely connect in big speeches. They connect in small offers: "Look at that," a sigh at the window, a joke, a hand on the shoulder. Each one is a bid, a small reach for attention or warmth. You can turn toward it, with a look, a word, a laugh; turn away, by not noticing; or turn against it, with irritation.
Newlyweds were watched going about ordinary days, and every bid and response was counted. Six years later, the couples still together had turned toward each other's bids 86 percent of the time. The couples who had divorced, 33 percent of the time.
Turning toward costs seconds. Look up when they say "listen to this". Answer the sigh with "Long day?" And if your own bids keep landing on a bent head and a screen, say so plainly: "When I show you something, I'd love you to look up." A missed bid is often just an unnoticed one, and naming it gives your partner a fair chance.
The bids you catch build a store of goodwill that carries into the harder conversations. Newlyweds who were playful and warm with each other over an ordinary dinner showed more humour and affection when they later talked through a disagreement. John Gottman and Joan DeClaire's is built around bids, with plenty of everyday examples of turning toward them.
A joke is a bid too, and laughing along is turning toward it. When couples were filmed telling the story of how they met, the time they spent laughing at the same moment went with feeling closer, more supported and happier in the relationship. Laughing at the same thing, together, seems to signal that you see the world the same way.
3. Ask the second question
"How was your day?" "Fine." The conversation ends there, and both of you feel a little lonely.
The first question is easy. The second one shows you were listening. People who asked more questions in a conversation, and especially follow-up questions, were liked more by the person they were talking to. On speed dates, those who asked more follow-ups were more likely to get a second date. And people underrated it: few expected questions to make them more likeable.
Follow-ups work because they show you heard, understood and care. "You said the meeting was tense. What happened?" says more than any amount of nodding. At home, swap the general question for a specific one: "How did it go with your sister?" Then ask the next one. Charles Duhigg's digs into the questions that turn small talk into a real conversation.
Listening closely changes the way you talk, too. When strangers met for speed dates, the pairs whose small words, like "the", "I" and "it", fell into the same pattern were far more likely to want to meet again: a third of them, against fewer than one in ten. Couples whose instant messages matched in the same way were more likely to still be together three months later, 77 percent against 54. That kind of matching is hard to do on purpose. It seems to happen by itself when two people are paying close attention to each other.
4. Share something real
Some couples talk all day about who's collecting the children and what's for dinner, and say little about themselves. Logistics keep a household running. Closeness needs something more.
That everyday chat does no harm. When daily conversations were recorded and pooled across 486 adults, more time spent talking, and more conversations of real substance, went with higher satisfaction with life, while small talk showed no reliable link either way. It's the deeper conversations that count.
How much each of you talks is rarely the problem. When 396 people wore voice recorders for several days, women and men both came out at about 16,000 words a day, with wide differences between individuals of either sex. If one of you talks more, that's down to the person, and the gap matters less than what the words are about.
One small word says a lot. Across 30 groups of couples, those who said "we" more had happier relationships and better health, and a partner's "we" was more closely tied to how the relationship was going than your own. It's a small sign of two people thinking as a team.
Sharing feelings and thoughts draws people together in three ways. People who open up tend to be liked more. People open up more to those they already like. And people come to like someone more after opening up to them. Each step pulls the next one along.
Going deeper also feels riskier than it is. Strangers asked to talk about something meaningful expected the conversation to be awkward. It turned out less awkward, and left them feeling more connected, than they had predicted, because the other person cared more about what they shared than they expected. If a stranger cares more than you'd guess, a partner is a safer bet still.
A deep conversation every night is optional. Share one honest thing: what worried you today, what you're looking forward to, something you've been thinking about. When your partner shares something back, that's your cue for the second question.
When what they share is stress, the urge is to fix it. Some of the best help is the kind they barely notice. Couples kept daily diaries while one partner prepared for a major exam. Support that slipped past the stressed partner unnoticed helped them cope, while support they were aware of seemed to come with an emotional cost. So alongside listening, try the quiet version: cook the dinner, take a job off their list, and skip the announcement.
5. Watch your tone more than your posture
Communication advice loves one figure: 93 percent of communication is non-verbal, with 55 percent down to facial expression, 38 percent to tone of voice and just 7 percent to words. It turns up again and again, and it's a misreading.
The figures came from two small tests in 1967. Women listened to single words like "dear" or "terrible" spoken in a tone that matched or clashed with the meaning, or looked at photographs of faces. The point was how people judge feelings when words and tone disagree. Albert Mehrabian, who ran the work, has said the formula applies only when someone is talking about their feelings or attitudes.
One part holds up, though. When words and tone clash, people believe the tone. "Fine" said through a sigh is heard as the sigh.
Your voice carries more than your posture. When people tried to get a tone across, listeners understood it about as well from a voice alone as from a face-to-face conversation, roughly three times in four. Seeing the person added little. So listen for the edge in your own voice, and if you hear it creeping in, say so: "Sorry, that came out sharper than I meant."
6. Keep the hard talks off text, and pick your moment
A text strips out your tone, and you miss the loss, because you can still hear it in your head as you type. Over email, people believed they had read the tone of a message correctly about nine times in ten. They were right about six times in ten, and knowing the sender well made no difference.
Writers have been fighting this for centuries. A Belgian newspaper publisher printed an "irony mark" in 1841. In 1887 Ambrose Bierce suggested a "snigger point" to add to every joking or ironic sentence, a curve that "represents, as nearly as may be, a smiling mouth". In 1899 a French poet proposed a mark shaped something like a small backwards question mark. None of them caught on. The smiley face finally did, a century later, and texts still go wrong.
How couples use texts matters too. Among young adults in relationships, women who used texts to apologise, to work out differences or to make decisions reported lower relationship quality. Sending affectionate texts went with feeling more secure with each other, for both women and men.
So text the warm things freely: "Thinking of you," "Good luck today," a photo that made you think of them. Save the apology, the disagreement and the big decision for a conversation where your partner can hear your voice and see your face.
Timing matters as much as the medium. When 107 married couples checked their blood sugar for three weeks, the evenings it ran low were the evenings they felt angriest at their spouse, measured by how many pins they stuck in a voodoo doll that stood for them. Sleep works the same way. After a poor night, people reported more conflict with their partner, and both partners read each other's feelings less accurately. Disagreements were settled best when both were well rested. So the big conversation can wait until after dinner and a good night's sleep.
7. Put the phone down when they're talking
You're telling your partner about your day, and they're nodding at a screen. It's a small thing, and it stings.
It even has a name. "Phubbing", phone plus snubbing, was coined in 2012 for an Australian advertising campaign, set up to promote a new edition of the Macquarie Dictionary. The word began as marketing. The habit is real: in a survey of 145 adults, 46 percent said their partner phubbed them, and 23 percent said it caused conflict between them.
When one partner was often distracted by their phone during time together, couples argued more about phones, and those arguments went with lower satisfaction with the relationship. Partners who worry more about being let down or left felt it hardest.
The phone itself is easy to deal with. Put it face down, or in another room, when you're eating together or when one of you starts to talk about something that matters. If the pull is too strong, a takes the decision out of your hands for the evening. Agreeing on a few phone-free times together is kinder than one of you policing the other.
Some behaviour goes beyond habits. A partner who checks your phone, controls who you talk to, or goes silent for days as a punishment is showing a pattern of control, and that's beyond what communication tips can fix. In the US, the National Domestic Violence Hotline answers around the clock on 1-800-799-7233, or text START to 88788. In the UK, the National Domestic Abuse Helpline is on 0808 2000 247, and the Men's Advice Line is on 0808 801 0327.
Where to start
None of these habits needs a big talk or a weekend away. Pick one. Tomorrow, when your partner says "look at this", look. Tonight, skip "How was your day?" and ask about one specific thing, then ask the next question.
Those couples sitting back to back were sure they'd been understood, and they got it right no more often than strangers did. Closeness makes it easy to run on assumptions. Each of these habits swaps one of them for a little attention. So next time you ask "What have you been up to?", add the few words that tell your partner which of the four meanings you have in mind.
Arguments that keep getting bigger? Why Conflict Escalates in Relationships Even When Both People Want It to Stop — what turns small disagreements into big ones, and how to step out of the loop.
Wondering whether your relationship will last? How to Find Your Perfect Life Partner — the signs that predict a lasting relationship, from how a partner takes your good news to how you argue.
Know a couple who keep talking past each other? Send them this. Catching each other's small bids takes seconds, and it's a good place to start.
Disclaimer: This article is general information about relationships.
Affiliate Disclosure: This article contains affiliate links. As an Amazon Associate, All For Life earns from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you. We only link to products we would recommend without the commission.
Sources
Savitsky K, Keysar B, Epley N, Carter T, Swanson A (2011). The closeness-communication bias: increased egocentrism among friends versus strangers. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 47(1):269–273. doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.09.005
Overall NC, Fletcher GJ, Simpson JA, Sibley CG (2009). Regulating partners in intimate relationships: the costs and benefits of different communication strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 96(3):620–639. doi.org/10.1037/a0012961
Impett EA, Park HG, Muise A (2024). Popular psychology through a scientific lens: evaluating love languages from a relationship science perspective. Current Directions in Psychological Science 33(2):87–92. doi.org/10.1177/09637214231217663
Gottman JM, DeClaire J (2001). The Relationship Cure: A Five-Step Guide to Strengthening Your Marriage, Family, and Friendships. New York: Crown.
Driver JL, Gottman JM (2004). Daily marital interactions and positive affect during marital conflict among newlywed couples. Family Process 43(3):301–314. doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.2004.00024.x
Kurtz LE, Algoe SB (2015). Putting laughter in context: shared laughter as behavioral indicator of relationship well-being. Personal Relationships 22(4):573–590. doi.org/10.1111/pere.12095
Huang K, Yeomans M, Brooks AW, Minson J, Gino F (2017). It doesn't hurt to ask: question-asking increases liking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 113(3):430–452. doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000097
Ireland ME, Slatcher RB, Eastwick PW, Scissors LE, Finkel EJ, Pennebaker JW (2011). Language style matching predicts relationship initiation and stability. Psychological Science 22(1):39–44. doi.org/10.1177/0956797610392928
Mehl MR, Vazire S, Ramírez-Esparza N, Slatcher RB, Pennebaker JW (2007). Are women really more talkative than men? Science 317(5834):82. doi.org/10.1126/science.1139940
Karan A, Rosenthal R, Robbins ML (2019). Meta-analytic evidence that we-talk predicts relationship and personal functioning in romantic couples. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 36(9):2624–2651. doi.org/10.1177/0265407518795336
Milek A, Butler EA, Tackman AM, et al. (2018). "Eavesdropping on happiness" revisited: a pooled, multisample replication of the association between life satisfaction and observed daily conversation quantity and quality. Psychological Science 29(9):1451–1462. doi.org/10.1177/0956797618774252
Collins NL, Miller LC (1994). Self-disclosure and liking: a meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin 116(3):457–475. doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.116.3.457
Kardas M, Kumar A, Epley N (2022). Overly shallow?: Miscalibrated expectations create a barrier to deeper conversation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 122(3):367–398. doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000281
Bolger N, Zuckerman A, Kessler RC (2000). Invisible support and adjustment to stress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 79(6):953–961. doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.953
Mehrabian A, Wiener M (1967). Decoding of inconsistent communications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 6(1):109–114. doi.org/10.1037/h0024532
Mehrabian A, Ferris SR (1967). Inference of attitudes from nonverbal communication in two channels. Journal of Consulting Psychology 31(3):248–252. doi.org/10.1037/h0024648
Kruger J, Epley N, Parker J, Ng ZW (2005). Egocentrism over e-mail: can we communicate as well as we think? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 89(6):925–936. doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.925
Bierce A (1911). For Brevity and Clarity. The Collected Works of Ambrose Bierce, Volume 11. gutenberg.org
Schade LC, Sandberg J, Bean R, Busby D, Coyne S (2013). Using technology to connect in romantic relationships: effects on attachment, relationship satisfaction, and stability in emerging adults. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy 12(4):314–338. doi.org/10.1080/15332691.2013.836051
Bushman BJ, DeWall CN, Pond RS Jr, Hanus MD (2014). Low glucose relates to greater aggression in married couples. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111(17):6254–6257. doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1400619111
Gordon AM, Chen S (2014). The role of sleep in interpersonal conflict: do sleepless nights mean worse fights? Social Psychological and Personality Science 5(2):168–175. doi.org/10.1177/1948550613488952
B&T (2012). McCann Melbourne goes guerrilla to coin word for Macquarie Dictionary. bandt.com.au
Roberts JA, David ME (2016). My life has become a major distraction from my cell phone: partner phubbing and relationship satisfaction among romantic partners. Computers in Human Behavior 54:134–141. doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.058